<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s up with go?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vetta.org/2009/04/whats-up-with-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vetta.org/2009/04/whats-up-with-go/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:22:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.vetta.org/2009/04/whats-up-with-go/comment-page-1/#comment-19421</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vetta.org/?p=288#comment-19421</guid>
		<description>I suggest to you this this interesting link

http://k21st.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/next-big-future-ai-milestone-supercomputer-given-67-stone-handicap-able-to-win-professional-19x19-go-games/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest to you this this interesting link</p>
<p><a href="http://k21st.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/next-big-future-ai-milestone-supercomputer-given-67-stone-handicap-able-to-win-professional-19x19-go-games/" rel="nofollow">http://k21st.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/next-big-future-ai-milestone-supercomputer-given-67-stone-handicap-able-to-win-professional-19&#215;19-go-games/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Legg</title>
		<link>http://www.vetta.org/2009/04/whats-up-with-go/comment-page-1/#comment-19413</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Legg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vetta.org/?p=288#comment-19413</guid>
		<description>A naive application of elementary RL methods fail with go due to the branching factor, as you suspected.  There are however people trying RL approaches that use the MC Tree Search as part of the algorithm.  I haven&#039;t read about this research myself, I&#039;ve just been told about it.  I believe it&#039;s still actively being researched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A naive application of elementary RL methods fail with go due to the branching factor, as you suspected.  There are however people trying RL approaches that use the MC Tree Search as part of the algorithm.  I haven&#8217;t read about this research myself, I&#8217;ve just been told about it.  I believe it&#8217;s still actively being researched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.vetta.org/2009/04/whats-up-with-go/comment-page-1/#comment-19409</link>
		<dc:creator>Seinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vetta.org/?p=288#comment-19409</guid>
		<description>This is a naive comment without Googling first, but has there been much research into reinforcement learning with Go?  It&#039;s been successful in Backgammon, but of course Go (and even Chess) are significantly more complicated and have much higher branching factors so maybe that would create policies that are just as computationally expensive as brute force techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a naive comment without Googling first, but has there been much research into reinforcement learning with Go?  It&#8217;s been successful in Backgammon, but of course Go (and even Chess) are significantly more complicated and have much higher branching factors so maybe that would create policies that are just as computationally expensive as brute force techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
